Elon Musk takes on Twitter

Posted: December 14, 2022

Musk’s purchase of social-media platform raises questions about free speech vs. responsible speech

One of the first facts every American student learns about the United States government is that the very First Amendment of the Constitution protects their right to say things.

Recent events surrounding a $44 billion midlife crisis and a certain government official having his Twitter account taken away makes this simple fact seem a bit more complicated than third grade material.

Elon Musk’s purchase of Twitter is largely motivated, he says, by a desire to ensure free speech, which he claims is being strangled on Twitter. Twitter bans users that violate their terms of service.

The questions become, does free speech apply to social media, and is Elon Musk’s purchase a bad thing?

Well, the answer to the first question is “no”. The First Amendment is a limitation on the government. As Twitter is a private company it has no direct legal responsibility to ensure freedom of speech on its platform.

However, that isn’t a very satisfactory answer. While legally there is no direct legal application, surely the sentiment behind the First Amendment still applies? Well, the answer to that is also “no”.

Even in sentiment, Twitter banning people from their platform isn’t a violation of free speech.

While it is true that Twitter is a predominant form of communication, if someone is banned from the platform they can still voice their opinions using other avenues. Their freedom of speech is still intact.

Furthermore, Twitter is legally quite similar to how a newspaper stand works. They as a private company can decide what content they decide to sell their customers. Being banned from Twitter may feel bad, but it is not a violation of human rights.

The answer to the second question is also probably “no”. Since his purchase of the platform, Elon Musk has unbanned everyone from neo-Nazis to white supremacists in the name of free speech.

Also since his purchase, racist, homophobic and misogynistic hate speech has gone up 202%, 58% and 33% respectively, according to research from the Center for Countering Digital Hate. The billionaire has also rolled back Twitter’s misinformation policy.

Despite this being done in the name of free speech, Elon Musk has done multiple other things to snuff it out. He has fired about half (7,500) of Twitter’s employees, a significant number of which were fired for speaking out in criticism of their new employer.

He is also censoring left wing voices, such as a January 6th researcher Chad Loder, on the platform while claiming political neutrality.

Elon Musk’s purchase of Twitter is less an enabling of free speech through the removal of content moderation and more the replacement of content moderation with content manipulation.

Free speech on the internet is complicated, but Musk’s actions have not helped, and his stated motivation is simplistic at best. The current purchase of Twitter is not a revolution but the actions of an upset individual who happens to have billions of dollars at his disposal, a problem unto itself (see “Musk and War”, page 1).

Most likely, the best solution would be to give less influence to social media over how we think as a nation. The platforms were never originally designed to be used as a news source or debate space and they do not make for good ones.

You may also like…

Consumerism’s dangers and “rewards” programs

Coffee drinkers may not be saving as much as they hope If you think you have enough money to get Starbucks every day and avoid unnecessary advertisements, you’re in for a surprise. Starbucks, however, would like nothing more than to keep you — and your wallet — away...

A new era for girls basketball

New coach brings different philosophy A warm salty drop of sweat falls from your drenched forehead as you are catching your breath. You place your hands on your knees as you watch your legs tremble with aching pain. Just as you regain your strength you hear the...

History and film: fact or fiction

Is the screen an adequate medium for depicting the events of history?    This October, highly-esteemed director Martin Scorsese released a must-see historical spectacle, and the latest addition to his filmmaking oeuvre — Killers of the Flower Moon. Killers of the...

Money and Sports: Sports Gambling Increase

“It came down to the very last play of the game,” said the Sophomore passionately. “I couldn’t stand still. They had to win.” The fifteen-year-old ended up winning 1500 dollars. The winter sports season is now in full swing and engulfing the halls of Minnehaha Academy...

Screen time: educational vs. recreational

How much is too much? Does it even matter? Tick tock, the clock strikes one through twelve, but on TikTok, the clock doesn't stop. Wake up, turn off your alarm, check the time, and swipe throughyour notifications. Get up, go to school or work, and look at some sort of...